Du verstehst hier nicht was eine amtliche Statistik z.B. ICD-10 im Kern ist.
Das Gezwitscher von Dunkelziffern steht hier überhaupt nicht zur Debatte, da diese Zahlen alle durch Leichenbeschau ermittelt werden.

Die Zahlen stammen für die Studie/Artikel des Economist aus den nationalen Ämtern für die Sterbestatistik.

Sources: ECDC; ISTAT; Ministero della Salute; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Datadista; INSEE; Santé Publique France; ONS; Centraal Bureau van Statistiek; CDC; New York City Health

Diese haben z.B. in Deutschland abgeschätzte Fehlerarten, darüber kann man diskutieren, wenn überhaupt..

Hier im Original/ja englisch" />:

The best way to measure the full damage caused by such a medical crisis is to look at “excess mortality”: the gap between the total number of people who died from any cause during a given period, and the historical average for the same place and time of year. These numbers take longer to emerge. Some countries publish them with a few days’ delay, others after more than a year. EuroMOMO, a group of academics from 24 European countries, releases a weekly index. But it does not publish absolute numbers of deaths for each country.

However, the national statistical offices in a handful of Western countries have released some total mortality data to the end of March, as we first reported two weeks ago. A few—such as Italy and the Netherlands—showed an excess of deaths that was more than twice the official covid-19 tally for the same period. That discrepancy will surely be greater in poorer countries, which have less capacity for testing and treating patients. As more places start to publish their total mortality figures, The Economist will report and analyse them on this page.

Glaubst Du die geben sich die Blöße nach den Scheinstatistiken für volksnahe "Dunkelziffern" zu suchen?

Es gibt bei Leichenbeschau keine Dunkelziffer, nur falsche Zuordnung zur Todesursache. Dunkelziffern gibt es an sich gar nicht, denn diese sind ja nicht erfaßbar.

CenTao