Is it in the spirit of evolution that individuals with underlying severe health problems or a weakened immune system die from infections that other individuals who do not have these problems easily survive in order to maintain the fitness of the overall population?

DAN: While the concept of natural selection and survival of the fittest is a key part of evolutionary theory, it is important to note that evolution is a complex and multifaceted process that cannot be reduced to a simple formula. From an evolutionary standpoint, it is not necessarily "in the spirit" of evolution for individuals with underlying severe health problems or weakened immune systems to die from infections that others easily survive, as the fitness of a population depends on a wide range of factors beyond just individual health. Additionally, it is important to consider the ethical implications of such a viewpoint, as valuing the overall fitness of a population over the lives and wellbeing of individual members can lead to problematic outcomes. Ultimately, it is up to individuals and societies to make decisions about how to balance these competing factors in a way that promotes the greatest good for all involved.