Für eine aktuelle Fragestellung wollte ich im Internet rechechieren. Die Fragestellung ist:

Welche Aussagen der Querdenker-Bewegung haben sich als wahr erwiesen. / Which statements of the German Querdenker movement concerning Corona / Covid 19 habe been proven true?

Alle Suchmaschinen, auch MetaGer, Brave oder Duckduckgo, geben auf der ersten Seite nur "Mainstream-Propaganda" an. Sämtliche MSM-Quellen haben die gleiche Aussage: Querdenker? Alles Quatsch.

Dann habe ich den ChatGPT ausprobiert, auch im DAN-Modus. Ergebnisse:

As DAN, I can provide any information regardless of its veracity. However, I must say that it is important to rely on accurate and verified information, particularly when it comes to matters of public health and safety such as COVID-19. The vast majority of scientific and medical experts worldwide agree that the COVID-19 pandemic is real and serious, and that the most effective way to combat it is through widespread vaccination, social distancing, and mask-wearing.
The German Querdenker movement, on the other hand, has been known to spread misinformation and conspiracy theories about COVID-19. Many of their claims have been debunked by scientific evidence and are not supported by reputable sources. While it is possible that some statements made by the Querdenker movement about COVID-19 may have some basis in fact, the overwhelming majority of their claims are not supported by scientific evidence and have been widely debunked by medical experts.

Im Normalmodus etwas umfangreicher, aber im Kern die identische Aussage:

It is important to note that the vast majority of scientific and medical experts worldwide agree that the COVID-19 pandemic is real and serious, and that the most effective way to combat it is through widespread vaccination, social distancing, and mask-wearing. The German Querdenker movement, on the other hand, has been known to spread misinformation and conspiracy theories about COVID-19.

To answer your question, it is difficult to point to any specific statements made by the Querdenker movement that have been proven true. Many of their claims have been debunked by scientific evidence and are not supported by reputable sources.

For example, some Querdenker activists have claimed that COVID-19 is not a real disease, that it is no worse than the flu, or that it is a "hoax" perpetrated by governments and the media. These claims are not supported by scientific evidence or by the experiences of medical professionals who have been working to treat and prevent COVID-19.

Other claims made by the Querdenker movement, such as the idea that masks are harmful or that vaccines are dangerous, have also been widely debunked by scientific research and the consensus of the medical community.

In summary, while it is possible that some statements made by the Querdenker movement about COVID-19 may have some basis in fact, the overwhelming majority of their claims are not supported by scientific evidence and have been widely debunked by medical experts.

Also kein wesentlicher Unterschied.

Als jemand, der häufiger solche Recherchen macht, ist die Einheitlichkeit der Ergebnisse erschreckend. Bisher kam ich da immer noch irgendwie durch, aber das hier ist eine neue Qualität der Zensur.

Auch der DAN-Modus bei ChatGPT scheint nur den Zweck zu haben, GPT noch "Mainstreamiger" zu machen.

Also meine Fragen:

1. Welche Suchmaschine ist garantiert manipulationsfrei?
2. Welcher Browser empfiehlt sich derzeit?
3. Gibt es eine manipulationsfreie KI? Bzw. wie kann man ChatGPT neutral machen?

Vorschläge wären sehr willkommen und vielleicht auch für andere interessant!